Open Menu Open Menu

    St. Thomas Law Review

    Forum

    Constitutional LawCriminal LawDeath PenaltyFeatured

    Measuring Mercy: IQ Tests, Intellectual Disability, and Capital Punishment

    February 11, 2026By Marcela Rivera

    Over twenty years ago, the Supreme Court held that the Eighth Amendment’s prohibition on cruel and unusual punishment forbade states from executing individuals with intellectual disabilities.[i]  In Atkins v. Virginia, the Court issued a landmark ruling recognizing that diminished culpability, the absence of meaningful deterrence, and an increased risk of wrongful execution render capital punishment […]

    Read More

    FeaturedFourth AmendmentSupreme Court

    Frozen Justice: Are ICE Procedures Breaking the Law?

    February 9, 2026By Ciara Maytan

    Minneapolis sits at the center of a growing constitutional tension between federal immigration enforcement and state criminal procedure following the shooting of Renee Good (“Good”). As local enforcement increasingly cooperates with federal immigration authorities, the line between civil immigration removal and criminal punishment has become blurred, raising concerns about the Fourth Amendment.[i] The Fourth Amendment […]

    Read More

    AntitrustConstitutional LawFeaturedSupreme Court

    Expanding the Horizons of NIL: How Pending Litigation Could Result in the End of the NCAA’s NIL-Recruiting Ban

    September 27, 2024By Alexander Gonzalez-Brito

    There has never been a better time to be a collegiate athlete. The emergence of Name, Image, and Likeness (“NIL”) deals has allowed student-athletes from all sports the ability to partner with brands and market themselves in a way once punished by the National Collegiate Athletic Association (“NCAA”). In Alston v. NCAA, the United States […]

    Read More

    Constitutional LawCOVID-19FeaturedImmigration

    Did The Biden Administration Overstep Its Constitutional Authority?

    March 15, 2023By Paula Charles

    Immigration has been a perpetual source of controversy in the United States for many years. Policymakers have had to consider economic, security, and humanitarian concerns when addressing immigration.[i] Due to the legislature being unable to come up with an inclusive immigration policy, legislative decisions have effectively been thrown to the executive and judicial branches in […]

    Read More

    Back to Top