Open Menu Open Menu

    St. Thomas Law Review

    Forum

    Constitutional LawFeaturedStatutory Interpretation

    Statutory Interpretation or Gun Control? How a Supreme Court Decision May Change the Meaning of a “Machinegun”

    March 22, 2024By Stephanie Blanco

      Pursuant to 26 U.S.C. § 5845(b), a machinegun is “any weapon which shoots, is designed to shoot, or can be readily restored to shoot, automatically more than one shot, without manual reloading, by a single function of the trigger.”[i] The definition also includes the “frame or receiver of any such weapon, any part designed […]

    Read More

    Constitutional LawFeaturedStatutory InterpretationTax Law

    Breaking Boundaries: Mandatory Repatriation Tax’s Bold Move in Redefining Income

    February 26, 2024By Samuel Bazylenko

        Taxation has been an ongoing storm of debate in the United States for centuries. Under the Sixteenth Amendment of the U.S. Constitution, Congress holds an enumerated power to “lay and collect taxes on incomes, from whatever source derived, without apportionment among the several States.”[i] This definition of income has been reinforced by the […]

    Read More

    Estate TaxFeaturedStatutory InterpretationTax Cuts and Jobs ActTax Law

    “I’m Sorry for Your Loss: The Unified Credit Against Estate Tax’s Future After the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act”

    October 16, 2023By Samuel Bazylenko

      In this life, there are two guarantees: death and taxes. Yet, even in death, one does not escape the imposition of tax.[i]  Since 1916, Congress imposed an excise tax on transfers of a decedent’s taxable estate. Today, Americans are confronted with the latest interpretations of such excise taxes, courtesy of the 2017 Tax Cuts […]

    Read More

    Criminal LawJudiciary

    The Safety Valve: Does “And” Mean “Or”?

    November 4, 2022By Robert A. Lawlor

    The meaning of the word “and” currently confounds our federal courts.  The seventh, eighth, ninth, and eleventh circuits have all issued opinions regarding the meaning of the word “and” in a particular federal statute, 18 U.S.C. section 3553(f)(1); however, the eleventh circuit recently vacated its panel opinion in United States v. Garcon to reconsider, en […]

    Read More

    Back to Top