Open Menu Open Menu

    St. Thomas Law Review

    Constitutional Law

    Constitutional LawCriminal LawFeatured

    From Accountability to Intrusion: Police Body-Worn Cameras and Constitutional Tensions in Florida Policing

    March 17, 2026By Jennifer Fanea

    What happens when a police officer activates his body-worn camera while responding to a disturbance at a private residence and weeks later, without the homeowner’s knowledge or consent, the owner learns that the footage of his living room, arrest, and emotional reactions was reviewed by officers and used to shape testimony? This commonplace inquiry illustrates […]

    Read More

    Constitutional LawFeaturedSports LawStatutory Interpretation

    Classifying Sex Under Title IX: Athletics and the Limits of Statutory Text

    March 5, 2026By Emilio De Armas

    The Supreme Court’s recent consideration of state laws governing participation in girls’ school sports has surfaced a familiar but unresolved problem in federal antidiscrimination law. Although these disputes have attracted significant social and political attention, the cases before the Court center on a narrower legal question. They ask how Title IX’s prohibition on discrimination on […]

    Read More

    Constitutional LawFeaturedFourth AmendmentImmigration

    Masks, Fear, and Federal Anonymity: The Fourth Amendment Reality Behind Masked ICE Agents

    February 17, 2026By Leah Llobell

    In recent years, Immigration and Customs Enforcements (“ICE”) officers have become far more prevalent across the United States.[i]  Media coverage routinely shows videos and photographs of immigration arrests and raids on businesses.[ii]  This widespread coverage often prompts the same question amongst the public: why don’t ICE agents identify themselves?  Although ICE agents frequently wear masks, […]

    Read More

    Constitutional LawCriminal LawDeath PenaltyFeatured

    Measuring Mercy: IQ Tests, Intellectual Disability, and Capital Punishment

    February 11, 2026By Marcela Rivera

    Over twenty years ago, the Supreme Court held that the Eighth Amendment’s prohibition on cruel and unusual punishment forbade states from executing individuals with intellectual disabilities.[i]  In Atkins v. Virginia, the Court issued a landmark ruling recognizing that diminished culpability, the absence of meaningful deterrence, and an increased risk of wrongful execution render capital punishment […]

    Read More

    Back to Top